Pictures Of Shih Tzu Haircuts, Stephen Sackur Illness, Hydrema 912hm Parts Manual, Articles E

on 21 Oct, 2016. Making an editorial decision. Share Improve this answer Follow answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14 user18118 21 1 Add a comment 0 Accordingly, our process elements are strongly linked by the first couple of passage points, because they indicate states of transition. Editorial decision making at Nature Genetics. Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through the following editorial process: The journals editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. From the start of manuscript consultation until the editors decision: The figure shows that there is a short way (red) without external consultation and the long and complex way with external reviewers (grey). The latter means to us that while the system itself is hidden from us, we use what we have access to: traces of how the digital infrastructure is used. If you need any assistance please contact us at Author Support, or contact the responsible editor for the journal. Such claims are difficult to make given the limitations many studies on editorial peer review face. Asked by Sanjay Karna How long does an editor decision take? Review Started and Potential Referees Accept were mostly performed by the reviewer and achieved the highest frequency (both had N = 8,937). The production process after acceptance, however, was very annoying and involved a lot of back and forth with Nature's production team, which also caused a rather long delay between acceptance and publication. We have also gained specific insights into how editors take their role in the peer review process seriously: despite automation of some administrative steps, decision-making as well as decision-communication remains in the human domain. The administrative procedures appear to be well covered by Editor assigned (N = 17,499), Editor Replaced (N = 561) and Secondary Editor Replaced (N = 333) as well as events indicating the contacting or assignment of reviewers: the editors choose the reviewers (expressed by Potential Referees Assigned (N = 10,888) and Contacting Potential Referees (N = 19,878)) and are informed about the outcome of their request with All Referees Assigned (N = 3,607). You will know soon. We do so by making use of the internal representation of manuscript life cycles from submission to decision for 14,000 manuscripts submitted to a biomedical publisher. Manuscript submission under review | Student Doctor Network Scholarly journals invest considerable effort in maintaining peer culture by establishing close links to authors, reviewers, and (guest) editors (Weller, 2001). Although editorial management systems have been introduced in the dawn of the current millenium, research about process generated data from these systems within scholarly journals has to the best of our knowledge not been published so far. Apparently, appeal plays a minor role with Waiting for Appeal (N = 355), Appeal Received (N = 358) and Appeal Request Accepted (N = 355), but with overall low numbers. sciencenature - In the second category, which Schendzielorz and Reinhart (2020) have called consultation, we subsumed nine events, which are mainly performed by editors, reviewers and none roles. The study has several implications on the study of publishing practices and processes addressed in the article collection about Change and Innovation in Manuscript Peer Review it is part of. This dimensionality reduction probably obfuscates some properties of the implemented process, such as if it may have been acyclic in higher dimensionality, which we cannot observe any more, limiting the potential for our investigation. We also found the different realms of the peer review process represented in the system, some events, however, indicate that the infrastructure offers more control and observation of the peer review process, thereby strengthening the editorial role in the governance of peer review while at the same time the infrastructure oversees the editors performance. The journal covers topics including: -Lasers, LEDs and other light sources -Imaging, detectors and sensors -Optoelectronic devices and components -Novel materials and engineered structures -Physics of light propagation, interaction and behaviour -Quantum optics and cryptography -Ultrafast photonics -Biophotonics -Optical data storage Authors may suggest reviewers; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains. Editors between Support and Control by the Digital Infrastructure Digital infrastructures, as Gillespie (2015) argued, are not neutral, but intervene. //-->Nature Editorial criteria and processes | Nature In this principal depiction, the digital infrastructure of the editorial management system is presented to foster values such as timeliness and comprehensiveness. round 1""nature nature metabolism. The editor-infrastructure compound while overseeing the whole process can only distinguish the other three components from each other, but cannot discriminate the administration. This becomes particularly apparent when comparing the implemented structure observed with the patent published in 2009 showing an increase in complexity: while the patent is fixed in time, the software has evolved. On the other hand, Initial QC failed does not happen so very often and manuscripts facing this stage must have something special with them. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. In the subsection above, we have shown for first submitted versions that the drafting of decision letters happens mostly for negative decisions. Does the status 'Decision in process' without peer review imply It also files who is affected by an event (Table 2). response letterresubmit, 3. According to Mendona (2017), they are designed to perform the management of manuscripts from submission to final decision, offering greater control, automation and logging of processes that were once manually done.